Conflicting methacholine challenge tests.

نویسنده

  • Jeffrey M Haynes
چکیده

An 11-year-old boy experienced almost daily wheezing, dyspnea on exertion, and sleep perturbation because of cough. In addition, nadir peak expiratory flow (PEF) was below 100 L/min, which was 30% of predicted (328 L/min),1 compatible with severe persistent asthma.2 After the initiation of therapy with 180 g of albuterol 3 times per day, the patient’s domiciliary PEF rose to 200 L/min and his symptoms improved. The patient was subsequently prescribed fluticasone 220 g twice daily. After weeks of combined albuterol and fluticasone therapy, the patient’s PEF was 300 L/min and his symptoms had regressed to a mild intermittent status.2 Three weeks after the initiation of fluticasone therapy the patient presented to the hospital for a methacholine challenge test (test 1). The patient did not take his albuterol or fluticasone on the day of testing. The baseline spirometry was normal (Table 1). Methacholine challenge testing was performed with a modified 5-breath dosimeter technique, nebulizing Provocholine (Methapharm, Brantford, Ontario, Canada) with a DeVilbiss 646 nebulizer (DeVilbiss, Health Care, Somerset, Pennsylvania). The methacholine challenge test revealed a PC20 (the provocational concentration of methacholine that resulted in a 20% decrease in forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV1]) of 20 mg/mL (Table 2). In response to this “negative” methacholine challenge, the patient was declared “nonasthmatic” by his pediatrician, and the albuterol and fluticasone therapy was discontinued. Shortly after the discontinuance of therapy, the patient’s symptoms and variable PEF returned. Two weeks following the discontinuance of therapy, the patient returned for a repeat methacholine challenge test (test 2). The baseline spirometry was again normal (Table 3); however, this time the patient demonstrated substantial bronchoconstriction in response to methacholine inhalation, with a PC20 of 8.85 mg/mL (Table 4). A PC20 of 4 –16 mg/mL is classified as borderline bronchial hyperresponsiveness;3 however, given the change in PC20 and the accompanying changes in symptoms and PEF variability, methacholine challenge test 2 was interpreted as a positive test for asthma. Jeffrey M Haynes RRT RPFT is affiliated with the Department of Respiratory Therapy, St Joseph Hospital, Nashua, New Hampshire.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Acute bronchospasm during passive exposure to bronchial provocation tests.

Bronchial challenge with direct stimuli, like histamine and methacholine, is very sensitive for diagnosing asthma and produces similar responses on a milligram-on-milligram or on a millimole-on-millimole basis [1–4]. American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines have proposed measures in order to protect technicians performing these tests, which include the use o...

متن کامل

Patients With Mild Asthma*

Background: Conflicting results from previous studies on the effect of bronchial challenge on ven¬ tilatory patterns in asthmatics may be due to airflow obstruction present before induction of bron¬ chospasm onset, as well as the different degrees of bronchoconstriction induced. Purpose and methods: We examined the ventilatory response to stepwise increments in respiratory resistance (Rrs) indu...

متن کامل

ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: general considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests.

This international task force report updates general considerations for bronchial challenge testing and the performance of the methacholine challenge test. There are notable changes from prior recommendations in order to accommodate newer delivery devices. Rather than basing the test result upon a methacholine concentration (provocative concentration (PC20) causing a 20% fall in forced expirato...

متن کامل

Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness to Methacholine and AMP in Children With Atopic Asthma

PURPOSE Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is typically measured by bronchial challenge tests that employ direct stimulation by methacholine or indirect stimulation by adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP). Some studies have shown that the AMP challenge test provides a better reflection of airway inflammation, but few studies have examined the relationship between the AMP and methacholine challenge...

متن کامل

Bronchial responsiveness to ultrasonic fog in occupational asthma due to toluene diisocyanate.

To determine the validity of ultrasonic nebulization of distilled water (UNDW, "fog") in comparison with methacholine challenge, in the assessment of toluene diisocyanate (TDI) asthma, we evaluated 75 subjects exposed to TDI with work-related respiratory symptoms. Subjects were submitted to bronchial challenge with methacholine at first, thereafter to UNDW inhalation and to specific challenge w...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Respiratory care

دوره 51 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006